Sunday, 3 November 2024

The Voice - Consumer's Voice

Must I agree?

I have an inquiry. So a customer bought a phone from me. The payment plan was monthly instalments. Now after month 2 they started saying they don't have money to pay for the phone asking if it could be returned and wanted the first instalment to be used to fix the broken screen and then return it.

I take it I'm not supposed agree to these terms right?


(I thought it would be good to take a question from a store rather than a consumer because I think this question says a lot about some consumers.)

No, you are NOT supposed to agree to these terms. Let's be kind and assume this customer is unsure about their rights and not just a bad person.

Let's think about this case step by step. They bought a phone from you and you were generous enough to sell it to them on instalments. (You might want to reconsider this idea.) Then they broke the phone and couldn't pay the second instalment. Neither of these were your fault. Then they asked you to take back the broken phone and use the money they'd already paid you, which was now YOUR money, to repair the phone. In other words, they want to turn back the clock and simply borrow the phone from you, break it and ask you to repair it.

I hope you're a courteous person because I think you need to take a deep breath and politely tell them to pay the second instalment and then fix the phone themself. You had a sale agreement in writing I hope?

Can they charge me to repair the phone?

I bought a brand new phone a REDMi A3 on the 3rd of September amounting to P1,600. Since last week the side buttons on the phone are not working. I went to them for help since they told me that the phone have 3 months guarantee only for them to refuse, saying its not a technical problem and if they repair the phone i will have to pay P150?


This store clearly needs some education. They need to know that Section 15 (1) of the Consumer Protection Act says that a consumer "has the right to receive goods which are of good quality, in good working order and free of defects". That's simple. Surely it's completely obvious that the buttons on a phone must work?

The next section of the Act, Section 16, says that if goods are faulty the consumer can return them within 6 months of purchase for a repair, a replacement or a refund. The store can choose which of these options they prefer but they can't decide to do nothing. They must choose one of those options. For those stores that find this difficult to understand, let me repeat one thing. It says six months. Not a week, not a month, not 3 months, not any other period the store decides. It's there, in plain text in the law. Six months.

I think you should go back to the store and tell them this. It's important to understand that most shady stores are really afraid of customers who know about their rights. Just mention these sections of the Consumer Protection Act and most likely they'll suddenly become much more friendly.

If you want to go a little further you should tell them that Section 16 also says that if the store decides to repair the faulty item and "within three months the same problem recurs" the store can no longer attempt to repair it, they can only replace it or refund the consumer. They only get one chance to repair it.

I suspect that faced with you and your knowledge of your rights, they'll treat you better. If not I'm happy to get involved and help you educate them.

No comments: