Please help me resolve this issue I have. I cleared my loan on January 22nd this year and the lender deducted in February which I understand since payroll for the next month had already been processed. They refunded the money on March 4th. I then asked if they had closed my account to which they confirmed that they did.
To my surprise, they deducted again in March. I called them and talked to someone who acknowledged that it was a mistake on their part and promised that I will get the refund first week of April. Mr Richard, to this date I still haven't received my money, I have been calling their offices only to be met with excuses and empty promises. I received my pay slip today and to my dismay I found out that they have deducted money again for April.
I have stop orders that have been bouncing since February because of this issue.
There's a word that describes this. 'Incompetence'.
You were very reasonable when you understood that the deduction for February might happen because of payroll processes. However, the deductions for March and April are unacceptable and suggest that something is very wrong with the way this lender operates.
I contacted them but have so far not had a reply. I'll keep trying but in the meantime I think that NBFIRA, who regulate non-bank lenders, deserve to hear about this so they can ask the lender to explain themselves. I wonder also if readers of The Voice and the Consumer Watchdog Facebook group deserve to know who they are as well?

Must I pay it all?
I rented a car at the Airport and did not opt for insurance as I assumed the car should be insured given the nature of their business. I collected the car on the 7th April and inspection was done on the car before I left and the existing scratches were marked.
When I dropped off the car on the 11th, I was made aware of the new scratch that was in the car. We agreed that they will send the quotations through. To my surprise, on the 12th April, I got an invoice detailing how much I am supposed to pay for the repairs, P5,038.
I then phoned the owner, asking to share the costs since the car already had the scratches, which are going to be repaired in the process. He said that the existing scratches are not visible, that is why he did not take it for repairs. He said I should pay all the costs since my scratch is the one that's visible.
My request is for us to share the costs on a 50/50 basis, since the car had scratches in all the quoted areas and the same would have applied had the car been taken to the repairs initially.
Unfortunately, I have no good news for you. It was a serious mistake not to opt for the insurance the company offered when you hired the car. Without that insurance, you are responsible for all of the repair costs that you incurred when the car was damaged while you had it. If the repairs benefit the owner of the company, then that's his good luck. Whenever you hire a car, it's incredibly important that you take whatever insurance that the company offers. It's also essential to take pictures of the condition of the car before you drive it away and then when you return it.