tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341685704389874782.post733060982412617211..comments2024-02-02T05:45:48.868+02:00Comments on Consumer Watchdog: An email from "Sir Edward Cooper"Richard Harrimanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02709540868409193767noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341685704389874782.post-51259780882922543532011-09-24T19:09:13.910+02:002011-09-24T19:09:13.910+02:00Dear Mr Harriman,
I have followed the tit-for-ta...Dear Mr Harriman,<br /> <br />I have followed the tit-for-tat exchanges between yourself and the person calling himself Sir Edward Cooper, who represents the humanitarian foundation in question. I have equally read the web site that he submitted referring to knighthood, and therefore include the following paragraph:<br /> <br />"Today the legitimate founts of honour who may bestow knighthood are the lawful heads of existing states, heads of non-reigning royal (sovereign) dynasties recognised at the time of the Congress of Vienna in 1814 (hence the numerous German dynasties but not the many soi-disant "pretenders" to the long-vacant Throne of Constantinople), the Holy See (the Papacy), certain de jure governments in exile, a few Orthodox Christian patriarchs and bishops, and the grand masters of a few historical military-religious orders of chivalry mentioned here (the Order of Malta most notably)".<br /> <br />As for the existence of the true King and Queen of the Kingdom of Hawaii, I am fortunate to have a friend who is from Hawaii (Honolulu) and who through Skype, educated me of the apology bill that the former US President Bill Clinton signed into law. (See US Law 103-150) In it, the United States Government apologises for the illegal takeover of the Kingdom of Hawaii. The bill was signed and supported by the US Congress. His Knighthood is therefore legitimate. As an added point, no Hawaiian nationals, were permitted to vote in the 1959 referendum on US Statehood. Only those who were Americans, consisting mainly of its armed forces and US nationals living in Hawaii at the time, were given the right and therefore voted for Statehood, thus robbing their nation. <br /> <br />As for not having any proof of a scam being planned and or undertaken by the foundation, demonstrates that you are the attacker of sorts and your answers in red does discredit you more than somewhat. You claim that you worked for 6 different banks. Did you get fired from the previous 5???<br /> <br />I admire how Sir Edward Cooper responded to you. It was indeed diplomatic. Having read the website, I would doubt that the foundation having all those people working for them, would not have a legal team by their side. Thus I did one better. I contacted someone that I know at Interpol in Paris. For your information, the foundation does exist as Interpol has been approached before on this issue and according to them, the foundation is legitimate and well respected and have confirmed their monetary capabilities.<br /> <br />On a last point, you refer to Botswana government people as being in a jovial mood because it’s Friday. It’s the tone of your wording that I find demeaning. The people of Botswana may not all be as educated as you, but at least when they attack someone, they do their research first. If for any reason they are placed at the end of the humanitarian line because of your antagonising undoing, I assure you that they do have legal representation in the Botswana government. <br /> <br />If I were you I would quickly withdraw myself from being at the wrong end of the stick. In trying to do your good deed for us Africans, you appear to be doing the opposite which I and others who read your comments, are beginning to see that you have indeed an objective. Blackmail could well be that objective.... Thank you.Alexihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06504385662319204968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341685704389874782.post-84177785195464048682011-09-24T19:08:37.851+02:002011-09-24T19:08:37.851+02:00Dear Mr Harriman,
I have followed the tit-for-ta...Dear Mr Harriman,<br /> <br />I have followed the tit-for-tat exchanges between yourself and the person calling himself Sir Edward Cooper, who represents the humanitarian foundation in question. I have equally read the web site that he submitted referring to knighthood, and therefore include the following paragraph:<br /> <br />"Today the legitimate founts of honour who may bestow knighthood are the lawful heads of existing states, heads of non-reigning royal (sovereign) dynasties recognised at the time of the Congress of Vienna in 1814 (hence the numerous German dynasties but not the many soi-disant "pretenders" to the long-vacant Throne of Constantinople), the Holy See (the Papacy), certain de jure governments in exile, a few Orthodox Christian patriarchs and bishops, and the grand masters of a few historical military-religious orders of chivalry mentioned here (the Order of Malta most notably)".<br /> <br />As for the existence of the true King and Queen of the Kingdom of Hawaii, I am fortunate to have a friend who is from Hawaii (Honolulu) and who through Skype, educated me of the apology bill that the former US President Bill Clinton signed into law. (See US Law 103-150) In it, the United States Government apologises for the illegal takeover of the Kingdom of Hawaii. The bill was signed and supported by the US Congress. His Knighthood is therefore legitimate. As an added point, no Hawaiian nationals, were permitted to vote in the 1959 referendum on US Statehood. Only those who were Americans, consisting mainly of its armed forces and US nationals living in Hawaii at the time, were given the right and therefore voted for Statehood, thus robbing their nation. <br /> <br />As for not having any proof of a scam being planned and or undertaken by the foundation, demonstrates that you are the attacker of sorts and your answers in red does discredit you more than somewhat. You claim that you worked for 6 different banks. Did you get fired from the previous 5???<br /> <br />I admire how Sir Edward Cooper responded to you. It was indeed diplomatic. Having read the website, I would doubt that the foundation having all those people working for them, would not have a legal team by their side. Thus I did one better. I contacted someone that I know at Interpol in Paris. For your information, the foundation does exist as Interpol has been approached before on this issue and according to them, the foundation is legitimate and well respected and have confirmed their monetary capabilities.<br /> <br />On a last point, you refer to Botswana government people as being in a jovial mood because it’s Friday. It’s the tone of your wording that I find demeaning. The people of Botswana may not all be as educated as you, but at least when they attack someone, they do their research first. If for any reason they are placed at the end of the humanitarian line because of your antagonising undoing, I assure you that they do have legal representation in the Botswana government. <br /> <br />If I were you I would quickly withdraw myself from being at the wrong end of the stick. In trying to do your good deed for us Africans, you appear to be doing the opposite which I and others who read your comments, are beginning to see that you have indeed an objective. Blackmail could well be that objective.... Thank you.Alexihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06504385662319204968noreply@blogger.com